Posts Tagged depression

Top 10 Medicare Risk Adjustment Coding Errors

By Carol Olson, CPC, CPC-H, CPC-I, CEMC, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS

MazeMedicare Advantage (MA) reimbursement can trip you up in ways you didn’t expect. If you are seeing MA patients, be mindful of opportunities and pitfalls.

MA health plans are reimbursed based on beneficiaries’ chronic conditions. Submitting an inaccurate diagnosis, or a diagnosis resulting in a different hierarchical condition category (HCC), is a compliance risk. Any change in the HCC could mean you are receiving too much or too little revenue. Either way, the code would not be validated and would be considered discrepant.

There are opportunities for you to capture a more appropriate HCC code. Consider this list of the top 10 coding errors for risk adjustment:

  1. The record does not contain a legible signature with credential.
  2. The electronic health record (EHR) was unauthenticated (not electronically signed).
  3. The highest degree of specificity was not assigned the most precise ICD-9-CM code to fully explain the narrative description of the symptom or diagnosis in the medical chart.
  4. A discrepancy was found between the diagnosis codes being billed versus the actual written description in the medical record. If the record indicates depression, NOS (311 Depressive disorder, not elsewhere classified), but the diagnosis code written on the encounter document is major depression (296.20 Major depressive affective disorder, single episode, unspecified), these codes do not match; they map to a different HCC category. The diagnosis code and the description should mirror each other.
  5. Documentation does not indicate the diagnoses are being monitored, evaluated, assessed/addressed, or treated (MEAT).
  6. Status of cancer is unclear. Treatment is not documented.
  7. Chronic conditions, such as hepatitis or renal insufficiency, are not documented as chronic.
  8. Lack of specificity (e.g., an unspecified arrhythmia is coded rather than the specific type of arrhythmia).
  9. Chronic conditions or status codes aren’t documented in the medical record at least once per year.
  10. A link or cause relationship is missing for a diabetic complication, or there is a failure to report a mandatory manifestation code.

Regardless of where you find shortcomings in your facility, you should consider ways to improve clinical documentation. Develop a compliance plan and implement prospective and retrospective, internal and external chart reviews with ongoing monitoring and feedback. Be sure to review records based on official coding guidelines.

March 20th, 2013

10 Comments

Health Care Quality and Value: Travel Further Down the ACO Highway

By Stephen C. Spain, MD, FAAFP, CPC and Angela “Annie” Boynton, BS, CPC, CPC-P, CPC-I, CPC-H, RHIT, CCS, CCS-P

Part 3: Securing the right care at the right time depends on whether ACOs can incorporate EBM into everyday practice.

Editor’s note: This is the final installment in a three-part series on health care quality, value, and the future of health care reimbursement in the United States. Our first article discussed the rise of evidence-based medicine (EBM); and last month we talked about accountable care organizations (ACOs) being the (r)evolutionary next step driving quality and value.

Medicare ACOs are intrinsically linked to performance measures, quality outcomes, and incentive-based reimbursement. The government is betting these links will improve health care outcomes and reduce costs. EBM can secure the right care at the right time: The key is whether ACOs can incorporate EBM into everyday practice.

Quality measures are a critical component of the ACO final rule. The formulation of a quality measure generally begins by identifying a problem, posing a possible solution, and following up with clinical evidence, as shown in the Table A. Supporting evidence in the form of clinical trials and studies, and deference to any existing EBM guidelines, allows the steward organization to create a measure that can be used for tracking or, in the case of ACOs, for incentive-based reimbursement.

Specifics of ACO Quality Measures

The ACO final rule stipulates reporting on 33 quality measures. These 33 individual measures will determine whether an ACO qualifies for shared savings. The measures are divided into two categories: Better Care for Individuals and Better Care for Populations. The quality measures are further divided to span four quality domains: Patient/Caregiver Experience, Care Coordination/Patient Safety, Preventive Health, and At Risk Population.

Patient/Caregiver Experience of care has an ultimate goal of measuring care for individuals. Using a survey mechanism for submission, this domain includes seven quality measures aimed at providing better care for individuals:

1.  How well your doctors communicate

2.  Getting timely care, appointments, and information

3.  Patients’ rating of doctor

4.  Access to specialists

5.  Health promotion and education

6.  Shared decision-making

7.  Health status/functional status

The Care Coordination/Patient Safety domain continues to focus on better care for individuals, with six measures:

1.   Risk-standardized, all condition readmission

2.   Ambulatory sensitive conditions admissions: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

3.   Ambulatory sensitive conditions admissions: Congestive heart failure

4.   Percent of primary care physicians who successfully qualify for an electronic health record (EHR) incentive program payment

5.   Medication reconciliation: Reconciliation after discharge from an inpatient facility

6.   Screening for fall risk

The Preventive Health domain shifts focus from individuals to better care for populations. Eight measures are included:

1.   Influenza immunization

2.   Pneumococcal vaccination

3.   Adult weight screening and follow up

4.   Tobacco use assessment and tobacco cessation intervention

5.   Depression screening

6.   Colorectal cancer screening

7.   Mammography screening

8.   Proportion of adults 18+ who had their blood pressure measured within the preceding two years

The remaining measures are categorized in the At Risk Population domain. The objective continues to be better care for populations with chronic illness. The measures are divided into clinically deemed, at-risk populations, including those suffering from diabetes, hypertension, ischemic vascular disease, heart failure, and coronary artery disease.

Measures Reporting and Payment

All measures ultimately are reported via the Internet. The Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) combines some of these existing measures into its reporting structure, so providers who participate in PQRS and are in an ACO do not face duplicate reporting requirements.

Payments are made based on the three-year commitment. The first year (2012), ACOs are paid to report. This enables the government to begin amassing data from existing, fledgling ACOs, which can be combined with existing Medicare claims data. These combined data allows the government to set benchmarks for quality and begin the scoring process.

Measures are phased in over years two and three of the initial ACO commitment. This avoids the stress and burden that would come from an all-at-once process, and allows ACOs to structure business operations over time and become more familiar with the measures.

ACOs = Opportunity for Coders

Understanding and addressing the central position of quality measures, PQRS, and ACOs will be crucial for all health care participants—including coders—in the years ahead. The obvious question for AAPC members is, “How will the evolving focus on EBM and quality measures reporting affect me?”

There are a few key points to consider:

  • Quality measures are reported by codes, and AAPC membership owns the coding world. No one understands coding like our members, and no group is as well positioned to tackle the challenges associated with changes and requirements in health care coding. Coders must begin learning how to identify and use these new codes. Specialty coders must learn and identify the reportable measures pertinent to their field. The National Quality Forum website is a great resource for learning about the specific quality measures and their codes.
  • Apart from providers, no one in health care has a better understanding of navigating the medical record than coders. Providers will have enough difficulty following necessary guidelines and documenting required measures. It will fall on “others” to access the health care record to identify, locate, tabulate, and report measures. In our view, those “others” will be largely the coding membership of AAPC, who will need to work with providers and EHR vendors to simplify entry into and extraction from the record for the required reporting elements. We foresee many coders will become experts in data extraction and reporting. Successful performance of these tasks will have significant financial implications for providers, imparting new responsibilities and heightened importance for coders.
  • At the outpatient provider level, reporting measures is in its infancy. Providers are looking for well-informed and reliable sources to help them understand and participate in quality measures reporting. They are just beginning to realize the looming financial penalties for noncompliance; this will fuel their desire to understand the new initiatives. Proactive coders will be prepared to address this provider need by learning how to implement new reporting requirements. In doing so, the forward-thinking coder will be firmly planted as part of the foundation of this new direction in health care delivery. The CMS website is a good place to start learning about quality measure initiatives.

We are at the threshold of significant and far-reaching changes. Everyone participating in the delivery and reimbursement of medical care is hopeful that we are ushering in a “golden age.” With the proper preparation and education, AAPC members are poised to play a vital role in this new era. Regardless of the outcome of this experiment, AAPC membership and leadership must plan and work together, so it can never be said we were unprepared to meet the challenge.

Table A: Quality measures based on clinical evidence.

Problem Hypothesis Studies Conclusion Steward Measure
Depression is a common illness for which there is effective intervention. Untreated, depression is associated with significant morbidity and loss of productivity. Would routine depression screening lead to increased rates of diagnosis and treatment, improving the quality of life for those patients identified with this condition? U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) evaluates the effect of primary care routine screening of adult patients for depression compared with usual care in 14 randomized trials in primary care settings. USPSTF concludes that, compared with usual care, screening for depression can improve outcomes, particularly when screening is coupled with system changes that help ensure adequate treatment and follow up. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) NQF 0418: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older screened for clinical depression using a standardized tool and documented follow-up plan.
Smoking is associated with significant illness and premature death. Can physician-directed screening and intervention reduce the rate of smoking in a patient population, thereby reducing overall smoking related morbidity and mortality? Multiple studies over many decades confirm that patients who are identified and counseled by health care workers to stop smoking are more likely to be successful in their cessation efforts. An American Medical Association (AMA) advisory group concludes that, while screening alone increases the rate at which clinicians intervene with their patients who smoke, it does not, by itself produce significantly higher rates of smoking cessation. Cessation interventions are also required to impact the outcome of interest. AMA Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement NQF 0028: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older who were screened for tobacco use at least once during the two-year measurement period AND who received tobacco cessation counseling intervention if identified as a tobacco user.
Complications of influenza include pneumonia, heart attack, stroke, and death. These are associated with significant health care costs, not to mention the devastation to patients and families. Can we identify those at risk for influenza complications and reduce their risk of illness through vaccination? Multiple large studies over many decades have evaluated the effectiveness, cost, and safety of widespread vaccine administration for influenza and multiple other vaccinations. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices concludes influenza vaccine administration lowers the risk of significant illness for patients over 50, and persons with underlying illnesses like asthma, COPD, and diabetes. National Committee for Quality Assurance NQF 0041: Percentage of adults aged 50 and over who received an influenza vaccine within the measurement period and within the respective age-stratified Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys.

 

For more information on ACOs and the Shared Savings Program, read the CMS final rule in the Federal Register.

Stephan Spain, MD, FAAFP, CPC, has been engaged in the full-time practice of family medicine for 25+ years. He founded Doc-U-Chart, a practice management consulting firm specializing in medical documentation. Dr. Spain can be reached at sspain@docuchart.com.

Annie Boynton, BS, CPC, CPC-P, CPC-I, CPC-H, RHIT, CCS, CCS-P, is the director of 5010/ICD-10 communication, adoption and training for UnitedHealth Group. She is an adjunct faculty member at Massachusetts Bay Community College and a developer and member of AAPC’s ICD-10 training team.

 

January 1st, 2013

No Comments

Understand Mental and Behavioral Disorders for ICD-10-CM Coding

By Rhonda Buckholtz, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CENTC, CGSC, COBGC, CPEDC

Coding for mental and behavioral disorders in ICD-10-CM will depend on the documentation found in the medical record. Working with clinicians on the new coding system and the expanded codes will allow for clarity in documentation so correct codes can be assigned.

Depression

Depression (also referred to as clinical depression, dysthymic disorder, major depressive disorder or unipolar depression) is a disorder of the brain with a variety of causes (genetic, environmental, psychological, and biochemical) that affects over 20 million people in the United States. Depression usually starts between the ages of 15 and 30, and is more common in women. It can result in increased work absenteeism, short-term disability, and decreased productivity, and may also adversely affect the course and outcome of common chronic conditions, such as arthritis, asthma, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and obesity.

The ICD-10 classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders, developed in part by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), classifies depression by code. Typically the patient suffers from lowering of mood, reduction of energy, and a decrease in activities. The patient’s capacity for enjoyment, interest, and concentration is reduced and is marked by tiredness after even a minimum of effort. Sleep patterns are usually disturbed, appetite is diminished, and self-confidence and self-esteem are reduced. Depending on the number and severity of the symptoms, a depressive episode may be specified as mild, moderate, or severe.

For mild depressive episodes, two or three symptoms are usually present.

A. The general criteria for depressive episode must be met.

B. At least two of the following three symptoms must be present:

  1. Depressed mood to a degree that is definitely abnormal to the individual, present for most of the day and almost every day, largely uninfluenced by circumstances, and sustained for at least two weeks
  2. Loss of interest or pleasure in normally pleasurable activities
  3. Decreased energy or increased fatigue

C. An additional symptom or symptoms from the following list should be present to give a total of at least four:

  1. Loss of confidence or self-esteem
  2. Unreasonable feelings of self-reproach or excessive and inappropriate guilt
  3. Recurrent thoughts of death or any suicidal behavior
  4. Complaints or evidence of diminished ability to think or concentrate, such as indecisiveness or vacillation
  5. Change in psychomotor activity, with agitation or retardation (either subjective or objective)
  6. Sleep disturbance of any type
  7. Change in appetite (decrease or increase) with corresponding weight change

For moderate depressive episodes, four or more of the symptoms noted above are usually present and the patient is likely to have great difficulty in continuing with ordinary activities.

For severe depressive episodes without psychotic symptoms, several of the above symptoms are marked and distressing—typically loss of self-esteem and ideas of worthiness or guilt. Suicidal thoughts and acts are common. A number of somatic symptoms are usually present.

For major depressive disorders, ICD-10-CM includes:

  • Agitated depression
  • Major depression} single episode without psychotic symptoms
  • Vital depression

ICD-10-CM classifies depression by episodes and types (such as mild, moderate, severe, and with or without psychotic features).

ICD-10-CM Example:

F32.2 Major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features

ICD-10-CM also includes codes for recurrent depressive disorders, as well as those in remission or partial remission. A recurrent depressive disorder is characterized by:

  • Repeated episodes of depression without any history of independent episodes of mood elevation and increased energy or mania
  • At least one previous episode lasting a minimum of two weeks and separated by the current episode of at least two months
  • No past hypomanic or manic episodes

For a classification of “in remission,” the patient has had two or more depressive episodes in the past, but has been free from depressive symptoms for several months. This category can still be used if the patient is receiving treatment to reduce the risk of further episodes.

ICD-10-CM Examples:

F33.0 Major depressive disorder, recurrent, mild

F33.41 Major depressive disorder, recurrent, in partial remission

Bipolar Disorder

Bipolar disorder is a serious mental illness. People who have it experience dramatic mood swings. They may go from overly energetic, “high” and/or irritable, to sad and hopeless, and then back again. They often have normal moods in between. The up feeling is called mania. The down feeling is depression.

Bipolar disorder can run in families. It usually starts in late adolescence or early adulthood. A medical checkup can rule out other illnesses that might cause the mood changes. Repeated episodes of hypomania or mania only are classified as bipolar. It includes manic-depressive illness, psychosis, or reaction.

In ICD-10-CM, bipolar I is classified as to whether the patient’s current episode is hypomanic, manic, and with or without psychotic symptoms.

A hypomanic episode is characterized by a persistent mild elevation of mood, increased energy and activity, and is usually marked by feelings of well being and both physical and mental efficiency. Increased sociability, talkativeness, over-familiarity and increased sexual energy, and a decreased need for sleep are often present.

A manic episode is characterized by mood elevated out of keeping with the patient’s circumstances, and may vary from carefree joviality to almost uncontrollable excitement. Elation is accompanied by increased energy, resulting in over-activity, pressure of speech, and a decreased need for sleep. Attention cannot be sustained and there is often distractibility. Loss of social inhibitions may result in behavior that is reckless, foolhardy, or inappropriate for the circumstances, and out of character for the patient. In some manic episodes, the mood is one of irritability or suspiciousness rather than elation.

Bipolar II is similar to bipolar I disorder, with moods cycling between high and low over time; however, with bipolar II disorder, the “up” moods never reach full-on mania. The less-intense elevated moods in bipolar II disorder are called hypomanic episodes, or hypomania. A person affected by bipolar II disorder has had at least one hypomanic episode in life. Most people with bipolar II disorder also suffer from episodes of depression. This is where the term “manic depression” comes from.

In between episodes of hypomania and depression, many people with bipolar II disorder live normal lives.

ICD-10-CM Examples:

F31.11 Bipolar disorder, current episode manic without psychotic features, mild

F31.64 Bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, severe, with psychotic features

F31.8 Bipolar II disorder

Cyclothymia and Dysthymia

Cyclothymia is a persistent instability of mood involving numerous periods of depression and mild elation, none of which is sufficiently severe or prolonged to justify a diagnosis of a bipolar or recurrent depressive disorder. This disorder is often found in the relatives of bipolar patients, some of whom eventually develop bipolar disorder.

Dysthymia is a chronic depression of mood, lasting at least several years. It is not severe, and episodes are not prolonged enough to justify a diagnosis of severe, moderate, or mild recurrent depressive disorders.

ICD-10-CM Examples:

F34.0 Cyclothymic disorder

F34.1 Dysthymic disorder

Mental and behavioral disorders can be grave in their consequences, and affect hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Coders will require a comprehensive understanding of these disorders to extract the appropriate information from medical record documentation for ICD-10 code treatment and diagnostic assignment.

Rhonda Buckholtz, CPC, CPMA, CPC-I, CENTC, CGSC, COBGC, CPEDC, is vice president of ICD-10 Training and Education at AAPC.

September 1st, 2012

No Comments

Medicare Covers Screening for Depression

Medicare recently added annual depression screening as a covered preventive service, in accordance with the Affordable Care Act. Effective Oct. 14, 2011, adult Medicare patients may receive depression screening once every 12 months in the primary care setting without a copay or deductible.

Requirement: The provider must have in place staff-assisted depression care supports who can advise the physician of screening results and who can facilitate and coordinate referrals to mental health treatment.

Report: The type of service is 1 and the HCPCS Level II code is G0444 Annual depression screening, 15 minutes.

Another thing to consider is whether your organization qualifies as a “primary care setting.” According to MLN Matters article MM7637, effective for claims with dates of service on or after the implementation date (April 2, 2012), contractors will pay for annual depression screening only when provided at the following places of service:

11 – Office
22 – Outpatient hospital
49 – Independent clinic
50 – Federally qualified health center
71 – State or local public health clinic
72 – Rural health clinic

Limitations: Places of service that are not considered a primary care setting include: emergency departments (EDs), inpatient hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), independent diagnostic testing facilities, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), inpatient rehabilitative facilities, and hospice. Also, treatment options—such as self-help materials, phone calls, etc.—are not included under this Medicare Part B benefit.

For further depression screening coding and billing guidance, read the complete MLN Matters article on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website.

December 30th, 2011

4 Comments

Medicare Covers Additional Preventive Services

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced, Oct. 14, in two national coverage determinations (NCDs) that it will add to the list of preventive services by covering alcohol misuse screening and behavioral counseling, as well as screening for depression.

(more…)

October 28th, 2011

2 Comments

« Older Entries