Posts Tagged drugs

ASC Coding and Billing: Know What’s Important

By Brenda Chidester-Palmer, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CASCC

The basics of ambulatory surgery center (ASC) coding and billing aren’t hard to master, but they do differ from physician and facility requirements. The following overview will help you know what’s most important in the ASC setting.

Definition of ASC

To understand correct coding and billing for an ASC, you must first understand what an ASC is.

The Medicare Carriers Manual, section 10.1, defines an ASC as a distinct entity, operating exclusively to furnish outpatient surgical services. ASCs are not in the business of providing office visits, laboratory services, diagnostic tests, etc.

A hospital-operated facility may be considered by Medicare to be either an ASC or a provider-based department of the hospital, as defined in 42 CFR 413.65. To provide and bill services performed in an ASC, the ASC must enter into a participating provider agreement with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Basic Coding and Billing

ASCs use a combination of hospital and physician billing. Although ASCs use CPT® and HCPCS Level II codes to bill most of their services (as do physicians), some payers will allow an ASC to bill ICD-9-CM procedure codes (like a hospital). Some payers even base implant reimbursement on revenue code classification.

It’s important to use the proper form when submitting claims. Medicare pays for ASC services under Part B and requires the CMS-1500 claim form. Some third-party carriers will accept the CMS-1500 form, while others allow the UB04.

Approved List of Surgical Procedures

For Medicare patients, you cannot perform just any procedure in the ASC setting. Medicare has an “approved” list of procedures for the ASC that CMS has determined not to pose a significant safety risk, and that are not expected to require an overnight stay following the surgical procedure. The list of approved procedures is based on the criteria:

  • They are NOT emergent or life threatening (for example, a heart transplant or reattachment of a severed limb).
  • They CANNOT be performed safely in a physician’s office.
  • They can be elective.
  • They can be urgent.

Procedures also do not involve major blood vessels or result in major blood loss, and cannot involve prolonged invasion of a body cavity.

Medicare publishes this list of covered procedures annually. Updates are published quarterly, or as necessary. The file consists of two addenda listing approved surgical procedures and covered ancillary services.

Addendum AA (Final ASC-covered Surgical Procedures) includes comments, payment indicators, and final payment amounts for covered surgical procedures. (See the Addendum AA example on the next page.)

Addendum BB (Final Integral to Covered Surgical Procedures) covers included and separately billable ancillary services. (See the Addendum BB example on the next page.)

Other addenda included in the file tell us how to interpret the comments and indicators listed on addenda AA and BB. You should have this file and refer to it frequently when billing CMS for ASC services. These addenda are:

  • Addendum DD1 – Final ASC Payment Indicators
  • Addendum DD2 – Final ASC Comment Indicators
  • Addendum EE – Surgical Procedures to Be Excluded from Payment
  • Addendum EE is the “Excluded from Payment” list. If these procedures are performed in the ASC, you may not be paid unless there were extenuating circumstances.

(See examples of Addendum DD1, Addendum DD2, and Addendum EE on the following pages.)

Packaged Services and Separate Payment

Payments to ASCs are “packaged,” which means related services are bundled together and paid in one lump sum.

Examples of packaged items include:


Some categories listed above include a note stating “not on pass-through status.” This means that even though payment is based on a package price, some items are “carved out,” or may be reported and paid in addition to the package price for the surgical procedure. Be aware of the supplies that have pass-through status: You do not want to miss an opportunity to capture the correct reimbursement.

Other items that may be reported separately include brachytherapy sources, as well as certain items and services that CMS has designated as contractor priced (e.g., procurement of corneal tissue).

Medicare Claims Submissions

There is a separate set of billing rules for ASCs. While some issues may be addressed by CMS, most billing guidelines are best obtained from your local carrier or intermediary. Some carriers/intermediaries issue very detailed guides (e.g., Trailblazer), while others may simply provide a list of links to the CMS website (e.g., Empire).

To reiterate, an ASC must not report separate line items, HCPCS Level II codes, or any other charges for procedures, services, drugs, devices, or supplies that are packaged into the payment allowance for covered surgical procedures. The allowance for the surgical procedure itself includes these other services or items.

CMS does, however, strongly encourage billing for drug and biologicals that are eligible for separate payment. ASCs should report supplies with the correct HCPCS Level II code and correct number of units on the claim form.

Device Intensive Procedures

A modified (and somewhat confusing) payment methodology is used for device-intensive procedures (i.e., procedures done specifically to insert a device, such as a pacemaker).

The ASC will get paid for the device, but does not submit a separate line item for the device. The ASC would instead include the cost of the device in the procedure code and submit one line item. ASCs are not allowed to base price on the allowable code from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS).

For example, if a device intensive procedure is performed, and the formula is to bill the Medicare allowable plus 10 percent, you may be leaving money on the table. If the 10 percent increase does not cover the cost for the device, the money will not be recouped. It is important to know the cost to the ASC and add the cost of the device into the allowable. See Tables 1 and 2 for the right and wrong ways to bill a device intensive procedure.

Modifiers in the ASC

Some modifiers used in the ASC are the same as those used by physicians, while others are unique to the ASC facility. Modifiers recognized for ASC claim filing are (these are abbreviated descriptions):

  • 52 Reduced services
  • 59 Distinct separate procedure
  • 73 Procedure discontinued after prep for surgery
  • 74 Procedure discontinued after anesthesia administered
  • RT Right side
  • LT Left side
  • TC Technical component
  • FB Device furnished at no cost/full credit
  • FC Device furnished at partial credit
  • PT Screening service converted to a diagnostic or therapeutic service
  • PA Wrong body part
  • PB Surgery wrong patient
  • PC Wrong surgery on patient
  • GW Surgery not related to hospice patient’s terminal condition

ASCs have their own modifiers for a discontinued procedure. Modifier 73 Discontinued outpatient hospital/ambulatory surgery center (ASC) procedure prior to the administration of anesthesia is used when preparation for surgery has begun, but anesthesia has not been administered. The patient is taken back to the “prep” area and has completed paperwork, etc. The reasons may be the patient has a low grade temperature, or has eaten within the past four hours. The facility charges for the preparation, etc., but adds the modifier to show the procedure was not completed.

Modifier 74 Discontinued outpatient hospital/ambulatory surgery centers (ASC) procedure after administration of anesthesia is used when the procedure is terminated after anesthesia is administered. Plans can pay from 25 percent to 65 percent of the allowable amount, based on the modifier and documentation of how much of the service was performed.

New modifier PT Colorectal cancer screening test; converted to diagnostic test or other procedure designates that a screening colonoscopy was converted to a diagnostic or therapeutic service. For example, a patient presents to the ASC for a screening colonoscopy. He is not high risk and has no symptoms or complaints. During the colonoscopy, a polyp is found in the sigmoid. The ASC reports 45380 Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; with biopsy, single or multiple instead of 45378 Colonoscopy, flexible, proximal to splenic flexure; diagnostic, with or without collection  of specimen(s) by brushing or washing, with or without colon decompression (separate procedure) or G0121 Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy on individual not meeting criteria for high risk. Modifier PT designates the procedure was planned as a screening, but resulted as a diagnostic procedure. For Medicare patients, this allows the procedure to be paid as a screening with no co-insurance.

Commercial Plans

Commercial plans may or may not follow CMS policy for ASC claim filing. Check the carrier’s site for information on claim filing, and check your contract with the payer.

Brenda Chidester-Palmer, CPC, CPC-I, CEMC, CASCC, is the principal of Palmer Coding Consultant, providing audits and education to physicians in northeast Texas. She has 25 years experience in both single- and multi-specialty practices. Brenda is the former coding compliance manager of Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, a 300 physician practice in Houston. She has spoken nationally at conferences and AAPC workshops, teaches PMCC curriculum, and is a former coding educator at San Jacinto Junior College in Pasadena, Texas. Brenda was an officer of the Houston, Texas chapter and former AAPC National Advisory Board (NAB) member.

October 1st, 2012

No Comments

UnitedHealthcare Prepares for ICD-10

Ready or not, ICD-10 is happening. Implementation of the expanded diagnosis code set may be two years away, but at least one insurer isn’t letting the grass grow under its feet. UnitedHealthcare is hard at work updating its medical and drug policies and coverage determination guidelines with applicable ICD-10 codes in preparation for the transition from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10 medical coding on Oct. 1, 2014. (more…)

September 10th, 2012

No Comments

OPPS Update Includes Added Coverage, New Codes, and Corrected Pay Rates

The October 2012 update to the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) includes added coverage, two new drug/biological codes, and three corrected payment rates. Providers and suppliers paid under the OPPS should take note of these changes to ensure proper reimbursement.

(more…)

No Comments

Chargemaster: Learn an Integral Component of Facility Billing and Coding

With a trend moving toward hospital care, consider chargemaster basics.

By Dorothy Steed, CPA, CPC-H, CPC-I, CEMC, CFPC, CPMA, CHCC, CPUM, CPUR, CPHM, CCS-P, ACS-OP, RCC, RMC

As more physicians head under the hospital umbrella to furnish cost-effective care, opportunities are opening for coders in the facility environment. Your doctor may be considering a move to a facility setting, or perhaps you’ve been considering taking advantage of new emerging hospital jobs. Whatever your motivation may be, now is a good time to learn as much as you can about the nuances of facility coding. To get you better acquainted with hospital coding and billing, let’s talk about one area of coding that is different from the physician office: the chargemaster.

The chargemaster is a large master file combining all services provided by each hospital. As patients receive services, that department enters the charges through this mechanism.

The structure contains these elements:

  • An internal general ledger number
  • A revenue code under which the charge will be posted
  • A CPT® code
  • The facility’s charge for one unit of service

Also included is a flag which indicates a current service, service or code scheduled for deletion, or inactive service.

Chargemaster Maintenance

The chargemaster needs to be updated at least annually, and when beginning new services or discontinuing current services. This task is likely to be a full-time position in a large facility. When a new fiscal year begins, it is common for hospitals to increase their rates across the board. This requires chargemaster updating to reflect the new rates. Chargemasters also must be updated to reflect ongoing code changes.

Posting Charges

Typically, all laboratory, radiology, respiratory/pulmonary, and therapy services are posted from the chargemaster, as well as pharmacy and supply charges. If the facility has a dedicated gastrointestinal (GI) or cardiovascular lab, these charges may also be posted through the chargemaster. When the designated department provides services to a patient, the department is responsible for entering the correct charges to the patient’s financial record. For admitted inpatients, the unit on which the patient is admitted will post the applicable room charges, drugs, and supplies to the patient record. Clinics, the emergency department, and the observation area will post facility charges applicable to their respective areas; and surgery, anesthesia, and recovery will post their charges. For surgery, anesthesia, and recovery, 1 unit typically equals 15 minutes (4 units would equal 1 hour).

It is customary for facilities to set their financial systems to drop claims to the biller’s queue in a specific number of days after patient encounter. For example: If it is set for six days, the claim will drop to the biller on day seven. This step allows time for departments to complete charging for their patients and for the coding department to finalize coding.

Coder’s Role

Facility coders are responsible for diagnosis coding of all inpatient records, ambulatory surgery, emergency department, and ancillary service departments. It isn’t uncommon to report 15 or more diagnosis codes on an inpatient record. Coders apply CPT® codes for ambulatory surgery and some emergency services. Patients who present for diagnostic testing, such as laboratory or radiology, will not require CPT® codes from the coding staff because these codes will be applied by the chargemaster. CPT® codes are not reported on inpatient claims; however, procedure codes from ICD-9, volume 3, must be applied by the coder. Facility coders also are required to report the present on admission (POA) indicator on inpatient claims and abstract the record. The abstractor is a separate software program that finalizes the coding function. These steps must be completed based on productivity and accuracy standards.

Biller’s Role

Billers and coders generally are maintained as separate departments in a facility, and likely do not interact with each other on a daily bases. The coders may be stationed in the health information management department, or they may be working remotely from home. Billers are most commonly based in the business office.

Once a claim drops to the biller’s queue, the responsibility then falls to the biller to review the claim information for posting errors, missing charges, missing modifiers, incorrect number of units, and coding completion. The facility biller must be adequately skilled to make these determinations. Although it is unlikely that each drug or supply will be recognized by the biller, he or she must be able to determine when required charges are missing. Examples are:

(1) Anesthesia and recovery is charged; no surgery charge

(2) Procedure code indicates implant; charge for implant is missing

(3) 230 units charged for anesthesia (This would equate to 15 hours under sedation, an unlikely number of units.)

If the biller determines that a claim has erroneous or missing charges, he or she must place a hold on the claim until the errors have been corrected. One rationale for the facility financial system’s automatic dropping of claims is to maintain some control of unbilled claims. The billing manager can determine the number of claims dropped to each biller and the number of claims released by the biller. The biller is held accountable for claims assigned to his or her queue, and must be ready to report held claims due to charge errors or incomplete coding. If certain departments have a high incident of incorrect or delayed charging, the manager of that department is likely notified and expected to develop an action plan to reduce charge posting errors. If there is a coding backlog, coding management is expected to explain the delay and provide a reasonable plan to bring the work current.

Delays and Late Charges

Another potential problem is charge posting delays over a three-day holiday. If services rendered on Friday are not posted until sometime the following week, the original claim will be incomplete. The delayed posting will drop to the biller queue as late charges (depending on how many days the financial system is set for dropping the claim). Medicare typically pays hospitals based on Medicare Severity Diagnosis-related Group (MS-DRG) for inpatient claims and Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APC) for most outpatient services. This equates to reimbursement for all services based upon the calculation; late charge billing is not accepted from facilities that are reimbursed based on these concepts. This is another reason facility billers must be skilled enough to recognize missing charges. If deemed to be the case, the claim must be held until the late charges have dropped and those charges must be added to the original claim. If released prior to the late charge inclusion, the original claim must be revised and resubmitted as an adjusted claim.

Keeping Errors in Check

The skill set required for facility billers is much different from physician billers. Although the chargemaster is a valuable tool used for charge maintenance and posting, the users must exercise care in correct posting and the biller must keep billing errors to a minimum. These performance stats are often tracked by management to determine areas of billing weakness and to plan for and implement training where deficiencies are identified.

Planning Ahead for Hospital Coding Trends

The Certified Professional Coder-Hospital Outpatient (CPC-H®) credential prepares a coder for the specialized payment knowledge necessary for facility jobs. The CPC‐H® credential recognizes expertise in the area of outpatient hospital, hospital‐based ASC coding, and independent ambulatory surgery centers (ASC). If you are interested in solidifying your expertise in these areas, go to AAPC website to learn more.

 

Dorothy Steed, CPA, CPC-H, CPC-I, CEMC, CFPC, CPMA, CHCC, CPUM, CPUR, CPHM, CCS-P, ACS-OP, RCC, RMC, is a technical college instructor in Atlanta and an independent consultant, performing physician audits and education for the Quality Improvement Organization in Georgia. Her 34 years of experience in health care includes working as a Medicare specialist for a large hospital system, as well as contributing to various medical publications, presenting at health care conferences, and developing training classes focusing on facility billing, coding, and reimbursement.

May 1st, 2012

No Comments

Physician Self Referrals and Compliance: What You Should Know

To keep designated health services in the clear, know Stark regulations and their exceptions.

By Julie E. Chicoine, Esq., RN, CPC

Physicians and their practices are undergoing increased government scrutiny with regard to their referrals and financial relationships for health care services. At the heart of this scrutiny lies the physician self-referral law, known as the Stark law (provided in full detail at section 1877 of the Social Security Act, and codified at 42 U.S.C. section 1395nn). As a coding professional, you should understand the basic principles of Stark law so that you are able to recognize when a possible infringement may be taking place.

Self Referrals Pose Conflict of Interest in Patient Care

Congress originally passed the Stark law in 1989 in response to a growing concern about physicians referring patients to laboratories where the physician had a financial interest. This posed a conflict of interest; Congress’ concern was that physicians who stood to benefit financially from ordering laboratory tests were likely to order more tests, including more complex tests, even when such services were unnecessary .

Following enactment, Congress expanded the Stark law’s prohibition to include additional designated health services (DHS) and extended its application to the Medicaid program. In 1997, Congress added a provision authorizing the secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) to issue written advisory opinions concerning whether a referral relating to DHS (other than clinical laboratory services) is prohibited under the Stark law. Congress also authorized the secretary in 2003 to publish an exception to the physician self-referral prohibition for certain arrangements in which the physician receives necessary non-monetary remuneration used solely to receive and transmit electronic prescription information. They established a temporary moratorium on physician referrals to certain specialty hospitals in which the referring physician has an ownership or investment interest, as well.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has published a number of regulations interpreting the physician self-referral statute over the years. These rules were published in phases and are referred to as “Phase I, II, and III.” An overview of the Stark law’s regulatory history can be found on the CMS website.

Get to the Core of Stark Law

At its core, the Stark law prohibits physician referrals to entities providing certain DHS in which the physician (or his or her family member) has an ownership or compensation interest, unless an exception applies. The law further prohibits the entity from presenting, or causing to be presented, a claim to bill Medicare or Medicaid for any DHS provided pursuant to a prohibited referral. Due to this broad language, the law also establishes many exceptions.

Under Stark (42 CFR at § 411.351), physician means:

  • A doctor of medicine or osteopathy
  • A doctor of dental surgery or dental medicine
  • A doctor of podiatric medicine
  • A doctor of optometry
  • A chiropractor

A referral is a request by a physician for, or ordering of, or certifying necessity for, any designated health service for which payment be made under Medicare Part B. DHS personally performed or provided by the referring physician are specifically excluded from the referral definition; however, the service is not considered to be personally performed by the referring physician if the designated health service is performed or provided by the referring physician’s employees, independent contractors, or group practice members.

DHS cover a broad range of health care items and services including:

  • Clinical laboratory services
  • Physical therapy services
  • Occupational therapy services
  • Outpatient speech-language pathology services
  • Radiology and certain other imaging services
  • Radiation therapy services and supplies
  • Durable medical equipment (DME) and supplies
  • Parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment, and supplies
  • Prosthetics, orthotics, and prosthetic devices and supplies
  • Home health services
  • Outpatient prescription drugs
  • Inpatient and outpatient hospital services

CMS Identifies DHS Codes

Because the regulations define certain DHS by CPT® and HCPCS Level II codes, CMS maintains a list of CPT® and HCPCS Level II codes identifying those items and services included within the categories referenced above. CMS updates this list annually to correspond with CPT® and HCPCS Level II manual updates in Medicare coverage and payment policies. The updated code list is also published in the Federal Register as an addendum to the annual Physician Fee Schedule final rule, which is published annually in November with a Jan. 1 effective date for the following year.

The DHS categories defined by the code list include:

  • Clinical laboratory services
  • Physical therapy services, occupational therapy services, outpatient speech-language pathology services
  • Radiology and certain other imaging services
  • Radiation therapy services and supplies

The following DHS categories are defined without reference to the code list (42 CFR §411.351):

  • DME and supplies
  • Parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment, and supplies
  • Prosthetics, orthotics, and prosthetic devices and supplies
  • Home health services
  • Outpatient prescription drugs
  • Inpatient and outpatient hospital services

Bottom Line: Stay Stark Compliant

When analyzing physician referral activity, physicians and entities must ask two questions:

  • Is there a physician referral of a Medicare or Medicaid patient for the provision of a designated health service?
  • Is there a financial relationship (a compensation arrangement or an ownership interest) between the referring physician (or his or her family member) and the entity that will provide the designated health service?

If the answer to both of these questions is “yes,” the referral is prohibited under Stark law unless one of the statutory exceptions applies. Stark exceptions are generally divided into three categories, including:

1. General exceptions

2. Ownership/investment interest exceptions

3. Certain compensation arrangements

Learn more about these exceptions by visiting CMS’ physician self-referral website. Stark law exceptions can be viewed in their entirety.

Seek Professional Advice on Referrals

Penalties for referrals violating the Stark law can be substantial. If a referral is made violating the Stark law and payment is received by the entity providing the designated health service, penalties can include: civil penalties up to $15,000 for each illegal referral, exclusion from participation in federal health care programs, denial of payment for services, refunding of payments received, a fine of up to $100,000 for each illegal cross-referral arrangement, and civil penalties up to $10,000 per day for failing to report violations. Physician and entity compliance with the Stark law is mandatory.

Because non-compliance with the Stark law requirements poses financial impact, physicians and entities developing arrangements that include referrals for DHS should retain legal counsel to make sure these referrals fit within one of the Stark exceptions.

 

Julie E. Chicoine, Esq., RN, CPC, is senior attorney for Ohio State University Medical Center. Ms. Chicoine earned her Juris Doctor degree from the University of Houston Law Center. She also holds a Bachelor of Science and a nursing degree from the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston. She has written and spoken widely on health care issues, and is an active member of the AAPC community.

April 1st, 2012

No Comments

« Older Entries