Posts Tagged fee schedule

Contracts: Start by Gathering Data

By Marcia Brauchler, MPH, CPC, CPC-H, CPC-I, CPHQ

It’s always a good idea to know the details of your payer agreements. When renegotiating your existing health plan agreements, it’s essential. The time you spend understanding your payer agreements will pay off continually during the many months it takes to renegotiate them. And the data you gather is an invaluable tool for the entire practice even after the contracting efforts are over.

Define Your Payer Market

First, define the payers who are available for contracting in your state and region. Instead of limiting your scope of possible payers to the existing contracts, look at the big picture and define all payers in your market. Some resources for your state would be:

  • Health maintenance organizations (HMOs): Check with your state’s department of insurance, or similarly named government oversight agency, such as California’s Department of Managed Care. HMOs must report their membership numbers on a regular basis, so this information is readily available.
  • Preferred provider organizations (PPOs): Your practice’s insurance broker might be able to provide you with key information, as would large employer “watchdog” groups who keep an eye on the insurance market consolidation for its impact on employer health insurance premiums.
  • Medicare Advantage: Look at the Medicare beneficiary website.
  • Workers’ compensation (WC) carriers: Check with your state’s department of WC site.
  • Independent practice associations (IPAs)/physician hospital organizations (PHOs): Look to your local hospital(s) website(s), under “Payers We Accept.”

Determine How Your Agreements Are Held

Renegotiating contracts is also a time for “housekeeping” your existing agreements. It is very complicated for a practice with multiple providers—and certainly for one with multiple practice locations—to be (and remain) loaded correctly and in the payer databases (online and hard-copy physician directories). Look at payer directories online to check how your practice is listed. You also can call payers’ toll-free numbers to check which providers and locations are listed under your practice’s tax identification number.

Consider also that if a physician has been a provider in the network for a long time, there may be multiple contracts attached to that provider. Payers will, most likely, default the payment to the lowest fee schedule.

This review with each payer of the demographics for your group is a great beginning to a contract renegotiation. You might start by saying, “We noticed not all of our providers are listed at South office on your website.” This is something a health plan should want to rectify because it gives the payer a more robust network. Now that you’ve begun the conversation, you can follow with, “While you’re at it, perhaps you can review the rates that we have been receiving since 2005 without any improvement?”

Define Your Practice

Have a thorough understanding of what is important to your practice before contacting payers to renegotiate your existing agreements. With all of our clients, we start with a few reports that help us understand what is unique about the practice and the provider’s specialty. These reports are:

Productivity by CPT®/HCPCS Level II code: Know your practice’s high-volume procedures. Your mix of evaluation and management (E/M) codes relative to procedures is good to know when payers offer fee schedules with different rates for office visits. Also know if the practice does consultations, preventive exams, in-house labs, X-rays, injections, supplies, and other services that are valued outside the “traditional” Resource-based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) fee schedule before contacting any payer.

Note: The procedure frequency count is essential to define for a given time (e.g., a month, quarter, or year). A list of only the CPT® and HCPCS Level II codes does not allow for the weighted analysis of future contract offers during the renegotiation phase.

ICD-9-CM frequency: Generate a list of diagnoses with a frequency of use for each code for a period (e.g., month, quarter, year) to understand which diseases your practice treats. This helps you define your practice to the payers. It’s also good to see how well your practice is coding (red flags would be codes that end in “9,” or include “unspecified,” “not otherwise specified” (NOS), or “not elsewhere classified” (NEC)). Especially with payers that serve Medicare Advantage members, the specificity of ICD-9-CM codes is increasingly taken into consideration when offering rate increases.

Fee Schedule (charges by code for insurance and self-pay): Knowing your fees for each CPT® and HCPCS Level II service is important. We do a quick calculation of the fee relative to Medicare to evaluate existing payer agreements. If your fees are set too low, for example, and you approach the payer for a rate increase, you won’t get it because the payer will know that you are already receiving, for example, 90 percent or even 100 percent of your charge.

Define Your Providers

We find it helpful to have a “cheat sheet” of the salient credentialing items that define a practice, as well as each physician and non-physician practitioner. As shown in Figure A, this spreadsheet helps us to gather necessary items when completing payers’ credentialing applications. The “Group Info” column is where information relevant to the practice should be entered. The “Physician Info” column should be repeated for each provider within the practice (doctor of medicine (MD), doctor of osteopathy (DO), doctor of optometry (OD), physician assistant (PA), registered nurse (RN), etc.).

 

Define Your Payer Experience

Gather data on your practice’s experience with each payer before contacting the payer. Know how much volume the payer represents to your practice, and have a sense of the payer’s “hassle factor” to your billers. In other words, you need to know if each payer pays you accurately and on time.

  • Payer mix: Know the number of patients and/or volume of revenue that each payer brings to the practice for a given period, (e.g., all of 2011). Prioritize those payers who deserve time and attention.
  • Insurance accounts receivable (A/R) aging: This report allows you to monitor, at a glance, how timely your claims are being paid and the age of your outstanding accounts. This is the best way to identify issues with a given payer that may need to be addressed through a renegotiation.
  • Clearinghouse reports: The summary data available from most claims’ clearinghouses is a quick way to see the volume of claims sent to each payer, and the adjudication of those claims (paid, denied, etc.).
  • Contract allowable exception report: This report shows the exceptions if insurance pays incorrectly, bundles, or reduces payments.
  • Denials detail and summary reports: These reports reflect which payers are causing denials. You should know the percentage of total receipts denied by payer. This can be leveraged in your renegotiations to quantify how bad the loss is to the practice.

Identify Online Payer Log-ins

In a renegotiation, one of the first questions our practices are asked by payer representatives is, “Do you have online access to our provider relations’ materials?” You want to answer “Yes,” which requires having online access to each payer’s web portal for providers. This sounds easy, but it actually took us 24 hours in one week to do the first time on behalf of one of our clients. Now that we know where to go for the registration, one of our practices can set up online payer access with most payers in about seven hours, which is still a long time.

A great place to get started is with Navinet (www.navinet.net/about/navinet-customers), which connects your practice, if you participate with each carrier, to its 30 insurer customers. Take the time to identify web portals and set up access for each payer with which your practice currently holds an agreement.

This does, indeed, take time. But the more data you have gathered and organized, the easier the renegotiation process will be for you. And even if you don’t renegotiate, understanding the payers that represent 100 percent of your practice’s revenue is always a worthwhile endeavor.

In the next installment of this series on contracts, we look at how you can prepare your data to better understand your practice, in anticipation of approaching your contracted payers.

Marcia Brauchler, MPH, CPC, CPC-H, CPC-I, CPHQ, is the founder and president of Physicians’ Ally, Inc., a health care consulting firm and concierge billing company for specialty physician practices. She works with physicians on managed care contracts, reimbursement, and practice administration. Her experience includes hospital, health plan, and independent practice association administration. Her firm sells updated HIPAA policies and procedures and online staff training. She is a published researcher and a frequent public speaker.

October 1st, 2012

No Comments

No Hard, Fast Rule Setting Up Your Fee Schedule

By Terry Leone, CPC, CIRCC, CPC-P

Physician fee schedules are the “usual and customary” fees a physician or group charges for services. Depending on the services provided, you may have multiple fee schedules.

For example, if the group owns the equipment and interprets diagnostic studies, it may charge global fees for the entire service. If the group does not own the equipment, but does interpret the studies (as radiologists working in hospitals do), it may bill for the professional component of the service by reporting the appropriate CPT® code with modifier 26 Professional services appended. Or, if the group owns the equipment but does not interpret the studies, it may bill for the technical portion of the service by reporting the appropriate CPT® code with modifier TC Technical component appended. Or, the group may bill surgical fees based on the facility in which they provide the services.

Hospitals refer to fee schedules as the “charge master.” Charge masters are as complex as the various reimbursement methodologies they embrace. Inpatient care is reimbursed via Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs). Some departments—such as the Emergency Department—are reimbursed by negotiated rates from various payers, while their ambulatory outpatients are generally paid by a fee schedule, similar to that of physicians. Due to hospital charge master complexities, out discussion here will stick to the physician fee schedule.

There is no hard, fast rule on setting your fee schedules; however, there are two methods the majority of physician offices and billing companies generally use.

The first method typically uses three separate fee schedules:

1. A workers’ compensation/no fault (WC/no fault), which is usually your highest reimbursement. Using just WC/no fault reimbursement rate for the fee schedule would inflate accounts receivable dramatically for all of the patients with general health insurance.

2. A Medicaid fee schedule, which is often the lowest reimbursement rate. If you use a WC/no fault rate based on local reimbursement rate, there would be no inflation of the fee schedule over the reimbursement rate. Setting these two fee schedules at the exact reimbursement rates will help to prevent over-inflated accounts receivable.

3. A third rate for all remaining payers, including all other insurances and any self-pay patients. This rate is the same for all patients and all insurances, with the fee schedule being higher than the highest payer of this group of carriers. This third group of charges will inflate your accounts receivable.

Using this methodology allows you to change a wrong insurance company without changing the charge rate for the service. Your physicians and billing company clients need to understand there will be payer adjustments (write offs) for each patient, which is the part of the charge that is higher than the carrier-allowed amount.

For example, if you charge $100 for a service of a participating carrier, but the payer allows $80, you have to write-off the $20 as a contractual disallowance because the charge was higher than the carrier allowed.

The second methodology is to load into your billing system the exact reimbursement rate of every payer you charge. The individual payers’ reimbursement rates become your fee schedule.

Although this method probably sounds better than the first, there are difficulties with this method.

For example, I have one HMO in my area with 42 separate lines of business, each having its own fee schedule. I would load all 42 fee schedules, plus the fee schedules of every carrier I send claims to. But the patient’s insurance information downloaded from a hospital does not tell you which line of business this patient belongs to. Even if your staff is registering the patient, the insurance card may not indicate which line of business. This means your staff doesn’t know which fee schedule to use, which can force a change to the charge amount and insurance company. Some managers don’t like staff-changing fees after the patient has been initially charged. Managing all of the different fee schedules is a large task—especially because payers often make throughout the year.

After you decide which charge methodology you are going to use, you need to set your “usual and customary” fees.

In the first methodology, it is best to use a percentage of the Medicare fee schedule to set up your general insurance fee schedule, use the workers’ compensation/no fault fee schedule for your specific area, and use the state Medicaid fee schedule for your Medicaid fees.

To set up your general insurance fee schedule, know your local payer reimbursement rates. For example, one of my local Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) uses 125 percent of our Medicare fee schedule for their reimbursement rate, while another local payer reimburses at 115 percent. After finding out the highest reimbursement rate for local payers, most offices generally set general insurance fees 15 to 25 percent higher to assure they are charging over the highest reimbursement rate. This assures physicians that no money is being left on the table.

No matter how you set it, your fee schedule should be logical, reasonable for your region, created using a set formula, and defensible during an audit.

July 23rd, 2012

No Comments

2012 DMEPOS Pay Rates on the Increase

The most recent update to the Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies (DMEPOS) fee schedule is now available. The changes, effective Jan. 1, 2012, will affect all providers and suppliers submitting claims to Medicare contractors for DMEPOS items and services.

The big news is a 2.4 percent overall increase to the 2011 payment rate, as well as a 3.6 percent increase in the labor rate for services described by K0739 (repair/service oxygen equipment), L4205 (repair orthotic device), and L7520 (repair prosthetic device).

(more…)

November 14th, 2011

No Comments

SNFs, Be Ready for Oct. HCPCS Level II Update

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) instructed contractors, Sept. 13, to update their lists of HCPCS Level II codes excluded from the consolidated billing provision of the Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (SNF PPS). The update, required by changes to the coding system, adds the following three HCPCS Level II codes:

Code Description Effective
J9033 Injection, bendamustine HCl, 1 mg Oct. 11, 2011
Code Description Effective
G0121 Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy on individual not meeting criteria for high risk Jan. 1, 2011
J0894 Injection, decitabine, 1 mg Jan. 1, 2011

Medicare contractors will reprocess claims affected by this update, when brought to their attention.

See CMS Transmittal 2300 for complete details. An MLN Matters® article is also available.

September 16th, 2011

No Comments

CMS Proposes 2012 Payment Changes for 290 Codes

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed revisions to the work relative value units (RVUs) for 290 CPT® codes to be enacted with adoption of the 2012 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (Jan. 1, 2012).

By law, CMS must review RVUs no less often than every five years. CMS’ recommendations following the most recent five-year review are detailed in a proposed rule posted to the Federal Register on June 6.

(more…)

July 1st, 2011

No Comments

« Older Entries